🔗 Share this article

When dawn illuminated the Amazonian city of Belém on Saturday morning, negotiators remained confined in a airless conference room, uncertain whether it was day or night. Having spent 12 hours in tense discussions, with numerous ministers representing multiple blocs of countries including the least developed nations to the richest economies.

Patience wore thin, the air heavy as exhausted delegates faced up to the harsh reality: they were unlikely to achieve a comprehensive agreement in Brazil. The latest global climate summit hovered near the brink of abject failure.

The central impasse: Fossil fuels

As science has told us for nearly a century, the carbon dioxide produced by utilizing fossil fuels is heating up our planet to dangerous levels.

Yet, during nearly three decades of annual climate meetings, the urgent need to halt fossil fuel use has been addressed only once – in a resolution made two years ago at Cop28 to "move beyond fossil fuels". Delegates from the Middle Eastern nations, Russia, and a few other countries were resolved this would not be repeated.

Mounting support for change

At the same time, a expanding group of countries were similarly resolved that progress on this issue was vitally needed. They had created a proposal that was gathering growing support and made it apparent they were prepared to stand their ground.

Emerging economies strongly sought to advance on securing funding support to help them address the increasingly severe impacts of climate disasters.

Critical moment

During the night of Saturday, some delegates were prepared to withdraw and force a collapse. "We were close for us," commented one government representative. "I considered to walk away."

The breakthrough came through negotiations with Saudi Arabia. Shortly after 6am, key negotiators left the main group to hold a closed-door meeting with the chief Saudi negotiator. They pressed wording that would indirectly acknowledge the global commitment to "move beyond fossil fuels" made two years earlier in Dubai.

Surprising consensus

Rather than explicitly referencing fossil fuels, the text would refer to "the Dubai agreement". Upon deliberation, the Saudi delegation unexpectedly approved the wording.

Participants expressed relief. Celebrations began. The settlement was finalized.

With what became known as the "Amazon accord", the world took an incremental move towards the systematic reduction of fossil fuels – a faltering, insufficient step that will barely interrupt the climate's ongoing trajectory towards disaster. But nevertheless a important shift from complete stagnation.

Major components of the agreement

• Complementing the subtle acknowledgment in the official document, countries will begin work a framework to phase out fossil fuels
• This will be primarily a optional undertaking led by Brazil that will deliver findings next year
• Addressing the necessary cuts in greenhouse gas emissions to not exceed the 1.5C limit was similarly postponed to next year
• Developing countries achieved a significant expansion to $120bn of annual finance to help them manage the impacts of climate disasters
• This sum will not be completely provided until 2035
• Workers will benefit from a "just transition mechanism" to help people working in fossil fuel sectors transition to the clean economy

Mixed reactions

As the world approaches the brink of climate "tipping points" that could eliminate habitats and throw whole regions into crisis, the agreement was far from the "major breakthrough" needed.

"Negotiators delivered some small advances in the correct path, but given the scale of the climate crisis, it has not met the occasion," cautioned one environmental analyst.

This limited deal might have been the maximum achievable, given the international tensions – including a Washington administration who shunned the talks and remains committed to oil and coal, the increasing presence of nationalist politics, continuing wars in different locations, unacceptable degrees of inequality, and global economic uncertainty.

"The climate arsonists – the fossil fuel giants – were finally in the focus at these negotiations," comments one climate activist. "This represents progress on that. The political space is open. Now we must turn it into a genuine solution to a protected environment."

Major disagreements revealed

Although nations were able to welcome the formal approval of the deal, Cop30 also revealed deep fissures in the primary worldwide framework for addressing the climate crisis.

"International summits are unanimity-required, and in a time of international tensions, unanimity is progressively challenging to reach," stated one global leader. "It would be dishonest to claim that Cop30 has provided all that is needed. The gap between present circumstances and what evidence necessitates remains concerningly substantial."

Should the world is to avoid the gravest consequences of climate collapse, the international negotiations alone will prove insufficient.