🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's lawmakers have voted to withdraw from an global treaty designed to safeguard females from abuse, including family violence, following extensive and intense debates in the parliament.

Thousands of demonstrators assembled in Riga this past week to voice disagreement with the vote. The ultimate authority now rests with Head of State Edgars Rinkevics, who must determine whether to approve or veto the legislation.

Referred to as the Istanbul Convention, the international accord only took effect in Latvia last year, mandating authorities to develop legal frameworks and assistance programs to end all types of abuse.

Latvia has become the first European Union member to initiate the process of withdrawing from the treaty. The transcontinental nation pulled out in two years ago, a move that human rights organizations described as a significant regression for women's rights.

Ideological Controversy and Opposition

The treaty was ratified by the EU in 2023, yet conservative groups have argued that its focus on gender equality weakens traditional families and advances what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a lengthy debate in the Latvian parliament, MPs decided 56 to 32 to withdraw from the treaty, a move proposed by political opponents but backed by representatives from one of the three coalition parties.

The result represents a defeat for moderate conservative government leader Evika Silina, who joined demonstrators outside the legislature earlier this seven-day period. "We will not surrender, we will continue fighting so that violence will not prevail," she declared to the assembly.

Ideological Disagreements and Reactions

One of the main parties supporting the exit is Latvia First, whose head has urged the public to select from what he terms a "natural family" and "non-binary concepts with various gender identities".

Latvia's ombudswoman the rights official urged the treaty not to be made political, while the group Equality Now asserted it was "not a threat to Latvian values, it served as a tool to realize them".

The recent vote has provoked widespread protest both inside Latvia and abroad.

Twenty-two thousand people have signed a Latvian petition calling for the convention to be maintained. The gender equality group the rights center has announced a protest for the coming week, accusing MPs of disregarding the will of the Latvian people.

Global Concerns and Potential Future Actions

The leader of the European organization's legislative body commented that the Baltic state had made a rash decision driven by misinformation. He described it as an "never-before-seen and deeply concerning step backward for women's rights and human rights in the continent".

He noted that since the transcontinental nation abandoned the convention four years ago, cases of femicide and abuse targeting females had increased significantly.

Because the decision did not achieve a supermajority majority, the president could potentially send back the legislation for further consideration if he holds concerns.

Head of State Rinkevics announced on digital platforms that he would assess the vote according to legal requirements, "considering state and legal considerations, rather than belief-based perspectives".

Recently, another member of the ruling coalition, the reformist party, indicated it would not rule out petitioning to the Constitutional Court.

"This decision represents a concerning situation for women's rights not only in Latvia but across the continent," commented a human rights activist.

• Domestic abuse statistics have been increasing in several EU nations
• The Istanbul Convention requires particular legal protections for survivors of gender-based violence
• Latvia's vote could influence similar discussions in other member states